- Audit finds Minnesota nutrition program for 40,000 seniors lack sufficient oversight (Star Tribune, 11/13/2023)
- The Minnesota Board on Aging faced criticism in a legislative auditor’s report for inadequate oversight of the Senior Nutrition Program, which provides meals to around 40,000 residents. Key issues highlighted included a lack of monitoring of program activities and contracts, failure to conduct required site visits, and insufficient documentation on how meal reimbursements are calculated. In response, the state board acknowledged the shortcomings, citing challenges in administering increased funding during the pandemic, and committed to addressing the recommendations for improved oversight.
- State agencies allowed pandemic cash to go to ineligible Minnesotans, Legislative Auditor finds (MPR News, 6/12/2024)
- Minnesota state agencies are facing scrutiny for allowing pandemic relief funds to be distributed to ineligible residents, with an investigation revealing that oversight and verification processes were inadequate, resulting in millions of dollars being improperly allocated. The report by the legislative auditor prompted calls for accountability and measures to prevent similar mismanagement in future aid programs.
- Audit finds Minnesota agency’s lax oversight fostered theft of $250M from federal food aid program (ABC News, 6/13/2024)
- An audit of a Minnesota agency has revealed lax oversight and inadequate controls, which contributed to significant theft and fraud from a program intended to provide food to low-income children. The report identified over $250 million in improper payments and highlighted systemic issues that allowed individuals to exploit the system. The findings underscore the need for stronger safeguards and oversight to prevent future abuse and ensure the integrity of public funds.
- Campus Protest Hearings Continue at the State Level (Inside Higher Ed, 7/16/2024)
- State-level hearings on campus protests are ongoing, with a focus on antisemitism and the handling of pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Critics argue that federal hearings on campus protests were politically motivated, but state lawmakers and higher education experts view these hearings as a necessary part of legislative oversight, emphasizing the importance of communication between legislators and university administrators for a more civil and productive conversation. The hearings address concerns about controversial statements, academic freedom, and the handling of legal charges against protesters.
